eh!   
Red Hill Creek Sewer Pipe Discharge Problems

         

A Brief Chronology

Note to reader — Bear in mind that Provincial standards for bacterial levels in waters used for recreational purposes are as follows:

  • For total coliform - 1,000 Total coliform/ 100 mL water
  • For E. Coli bacteria - 100 bacteria/ 100 mL water

Levels higher than these are deemed unsafe for human contact.

It is also important to understand that the City of Hamilton is liable for the discharge of any deleterious substances from its storm and combined sewer outfalls into the natural environment. The Ministry of the Environment is responsible for ensuring that no one discharges deleterious substances into the natural environment.


HISTORICAL EFFORTS

Mid-1980s
Greenhill tank is constructed and, soon thereafter, residents begin to complain about severe odour problems.

Summer 1994
Dr. Sorger's students sample at Greenhill, Queenston, Melvin, and Bancroft outfalls. At all locations, total coliform levels are high — averaging in the 200,000 total coliform/ 100 mL range — with a high of 2,500,000 per 100 mL in the constant trickle at the Greenhill outfall.

Summer 1995
Dr. Sorger's students sample at sewer outfalls in and around Buttermilk falls and the Upper Ottawa Street landfill.

Summer 1996
Dr. Sorger's students sample the Davis Creek — a tributary to the Red Hill Creek — and find more problematic sewer discharges.

Spring 1998
Dr. Sorger's students sample at the Greenhill tank again. This time, total coliform counts are as high as 6,400,000 per 100 mL and E. coli counts are as high as 220,000 per 100 mL.

Summer 1998
Concerned residents write a letter to Mr. Leo Gohier from the former Regional Municipality of Hamilton-Wentworth's Environmental Services Department raising concerns about the Greenhill site and, more specifically, the continuous trickle from the outfall pipe, the presence of the stagnant pool at the end of the outfall pad, the easy public access to the contaminated pond, and the lack of warning to the public of the dangers at the site.

Mr. Gohier responds to Ward 5 Councillor Chad Collins that there is no need to post public warnings at the site but Collins pushes and signs are installed indicating that the area 'may be contaminated'. Staff also indicate that the continuous trickle is simply groundwater welling up into the concrete pipes via cracks. The fence at the edge of the pond is also extended slightly, but no other work is done to rectify the problems at the site.

Summer 1999
The Sierra Legal Defense Fund and the Environmental Bureau of Investigation work with concerned citizens to begin sampling at the Greenhill trickle and pond. Results indicate a violation of provincial and federal environmental laws and SLDF warns that the former region is vulnerable to charges. Citizens again raise concerns and the region responds by regularly pumping out the pond at the end of the Greenhill outfall.

At the same time, the region begins a class assessment in order to secure approvals to twin the combined sewer overflow tank and the drop shaft which brings sewage and storm water over the escarpment and down into the Red Hill sewer line. Concerned residents attend the Open House and, again, raise concerns about the continuous trickle, the severe odour problems, and the contaminated pond at the base of the CSO outfall spill pad.

Summer 2001
By now, the new city no longer pumps out the Greenhill pond. It is left filled to the brim, directly discharging contaminated water to the Red Hill Creek 24 hours a day, 7 days a week.

Fall 2001
Dr. Sorger's students return yet again to Greenhill where contamination persists — this time with levels of total coliform as high as 37,000 per 100 mL and E. coli levels as high as 4,200 per 100 mL.

Winter 2001
The final class assessment report for the Greenhill Tank twinning, while it acknowledges the concerns raised by citizens and concurs that there is a problem, proposes no solution to rectify the problem.

In February,
several residents subsequently submit bump-up requests to the provincial Minister of the Environment, raising concerns about the failure of the class assessment to address all concerns at the site. The bump-up constitutes a call for a more thorough evaluation of the project.

By March,
a meeting is organized by the new City of Hamilton to resolve citizen concerns. At this meeting, residents learn that a walk-in investigation of the outfall pipe has confirmed that faulty seals are allowing raw sewage to discharge out of the pipe — causing the contaminated trickle that has existed at the site for almost a decade.

The city commits to putting a temporary seal in place to stop the leaks. It also promises to begin to investigate options for addressing the scour pond at the outfall apron with the goal being that within the year a solution will have been constructed or at least be 'well underway'. The city also promises to keep bump-up requesters notified of its progress and the resolution of problems at the outfall.

Summer 2001
Some residents withdraw their bump-up requests, not wanting to delay the twinning of the Greenhill tank, but still raising concerns with the Ministry of Environment regarding the continuous trickle and the contaminated pond. Others leave their bump-up requests in place in hopes that the city will address their concerns more thoroughly.

Fall 2001
After receiving no updates from the city on progress with respect to the Greenhill situation, a citizen bump-up requestor contacts the city to determine whether any progress has been made. The city explains that it will address the trickle problem through replacement of a diversion structure within the pipe — but that this is best left for when the new tank is built. The city also indicates that options to resolve the problems with the scour pond continue to be explored in the hope that solutions will be identified in a short while.


MORE RECENTLY

August 30, 2001
Residents in the Waterloo Street neighbourhood at the north end of the Red Hill Valley observe a fuel oil spill on the creek surface. They trace the source to an outfall pipe discharging from the Paling truck wash directly into Red Hill Creek. Paling subsequently diverts its truck wash flow from the creek to the sanitary sewer so that it can be piped away for treatment.

September 6 , 2001
While in town with his patrol boat, Lake Ontario Keeper Mark Mattson joins Lynda Lukasik for a walkabout along the Red Hill Creek, starting at the Brampton Landfill. They soon observe that the surface of the creek is completely coated in an oily, sweet smelling material. They trace the source to the Bancroft outfall near the main CN rail line. At the Bancroft outfall, there is a small scour pond which is filled with a milky-coloured oily substance. The spill is reported to the MOE and to the City of Hamilton.

September 13 2001
Environment Hamilton's Lynda Lukasik begins regular bike rides down to the valley to check sewer outfall pipes. A trip back to the Bancroft outfall results in a call to the MOE spills line again because the same oily substances is being discharged.

September 14, 2001
Another bike trip results in the observation of a discoloured and foul-smelling discharge from the Brampton outfall. Spill reported to the City of Hamilton.

September-October
Observations made by Lynda on days when there should not have been significant discharges coming out of the storm sewers or the combined sewer outfalls (ie. It hadn't rained for at least 24 hours) reveal that there are problem discharges coming out of the Brampton outfall approximately 40% of the time and out of the Bancroft outfall approximately 50% of the time.

October - November
Lynda moves upstream to determine the condition of additional outfalls. She observes constant flows from storm and combined sewer outfall pipes on the east and west sides of the creek at Melvin Avenue. At Queenston, there is an incredibly stagnant and long channel way running from a combined sewer outfall to the creek. The water in the channel way is a chalky green colour. The Queenston channel itself contains a storm sewer outfall.

On October 29th,
the tail end of a severe spill event is observed at the Queenston channel storm sewer outfall. A blackish grey substance is observed discharging from this outfall. The substance has coated half of the concrete channel and the downstream natural channel with a fine black-grey particulate. When this material is stirred up, it creates oily deposits on the surface of the water. Where this material has settled, the creek appears black.

Dr. Joe Minor gets involved in the investigation, raising concerns about the fact that the annual salmon spawn is underway and the fish must make their way through black waters. He estimates that approximately 800 litres of this black discharge has ended up in the creek ecosystem. After several visits and much convincing, the city agrees to take a sample of the material. The results of this analysis have not yet been provided to concerned citizens.

December 12, 2001
The Hamilton District Office of the Ontario Ministry of the Environment issues four orders against the City of Hamilton for allowing the discharge of contaminants from storm and combined sewer outfalls into the Red Hill Creek.

December 21, 2001
Environment Hamilton makes a public announcement regarding the four MOE orders, applauding the MOE's efforts to enhance and protect the Red Hill Creek ecosystem. See comments below...

Environment Hamilton News Conference
Comments by Lynda Lukasik, Executive Director

Thank you for joining us here this morning. My name is Lynda Lukasik. I am joined here today by my associates from Environment Hamilton — Don McLean and Brian McHattie. We would like to extend a warm welcome to residents of the Rosedale neighbourhood who have joined us today.

We at Environment Hamilton are pleased to announce that, after many years of frustrated citizen efforts to see water quality problems in the Red Hill Creek resolved, the city of Hamilton is now being required to undertake a comprehensive evaluation of the impacts of sewer discharges into the creek.

This is because on December 12th of this year, the Hamilton District office of the Ministry of the Environment issued four orders against the City of Hamilton. These orders all relate to problems associated with storm and combined sewer outfalls discharging directly into the Red Hill Creek. These contraventions all fall under section 30 (1) of the Ontario Water Resources Act — and, as the orders state, relate to the fact that the city is causing the "discharge of/ or permitting the discharge of a contaminant into the waters of the Red Hill Creek that may impair the quality of the waters".

I am now going to briefly walk you through the details of these orders. Following this, we would like to put the problems in the creek into perspective. Don McLean will provide an overview of the history of citizen efforts to see many of these problems resolved, and I will finish with an overview of recent efforts. Finally, we will be more than happy to take anyone who is interested down to see the Greenhill tank outfall area firsthand. It's an experience you won't want to miss and one that you'll never forget!

The first of the four Ministry orders
This order is an overarching requirement that the city conduct a comprehensive assessment of all discharge points to the Red Hill Creek.

Justification for the requirement rests on the following facts:

  • In the orders, the MOE reinforces the fact that it is the city that is responsible for the operation and the management of these sewers.

  • It indicates that, at the present time, the 'city is unable to provide a comprehensive assessment to identify all discharge points, their water quality, and cause of contamination'.

  • The ministry goes on to state that the 'city has not been able to identify and stop contaminated discharges in an efficient and effective manner'.

  • Finally, the ministry justifies its actions by stating that the 'Red Hill Creek Valley is a vital natural ecosystem with many nature paths and ready access to the public.'

The comprehensive assessment set out in the first order therefore requires the city to do the following:

  • prepare a site plan indicating all points of discharge to the creek — including details of bacteriological and chemical water quality.

  • identify and quantify all contaminated, non-compliant discharge points.

  • where contamination does exist, the city must:

    • identify the cause of the contamination

    • AND

    • resolve the problems at contaminated discharge points

  • The city must also post signs to warn the public of points of identified contamination when analysis is available.

THE CITY MUST COMPLY WITH THESE REQUIREMENTS BY JULY 1, 2002.

The second and third orders
These relate to the Bancroft storm sewer outfall and the Brampton storm sewer outfall - both located in the northern stretches of the valley.

At these sites, the Ministry indicates that these sewers have discharged contaminants to the natural environment on numerous occasions. Further, the Ministry states that
"both the routine inspection frequency and the spill investigation procedures appear not to be adequate (by the city) given the repeated nature of spills".

For these sites, the city must develop, document, and implement a comprehensive inspection and maintenance plan to monitor the discharges for spills and other discharges of concern and to respond to and cleanup such discharges.
THIS MUST BE COMPLETED BY JANUARY 31, 2002

At both of these outfalls, the city must install & maintain a semi-permanent boom — as a minimum preventive measure against spills from these sewers.

THIS MUST BE COMPLETED BY JANUARY 11, 2002

Finally, the fourth order
This order relates to the Greenhill combined sewer overflow tank outfall — a facility just beyond where we are standing right now. This order has emerged out of the Ministry's acknowledgment of the fact that "the contaminant flow from the combined sewer overflow outfall is determined to flow to the natural environment at all times (24 hours per day) even when the combined sewer overflow is not in an overflow conditions".

The ministry also indicates that the "combined sewer overflow effluent contributes directly to the contamination of a pond and associated channel which convey the effluent from the combined sewer overflow to the Red Hill Creek".

Therefore the city is required to undertake the following measures at Greenhill:

  • By March 13, 2002 — cease discharge, in non-flow conditions, of the effluent from the combined sewer overflow to the Red Hill Creek.

  • -AND -

  • undertake work which will prevent the retention of contaminated effluent in the associated pond and channel.
(The historical chronology was presented here)

So, as you can see, we are very pleased that the Ministry of the Environment has taken the necessary steps to issue these orders.

The Red Hill Creek ecosystem is a valuable ecosystem. Time and time again, we are learning that many of the most serious impacts on this creek and its larger ecosystem are being caused by our own municipal government.

I need only say Upper Ottawa Street, Rennie Street, and Brampton Street landfills to reinforce this fact. As citizens, we need to push for this important natural resource to be rehabilitated and protected from the harm inflicted by municipal government.

These orders are a strong step in the right direction — a legally enforceable tool to ensure that the city of Hamilton does the right thing here and resolves these chronic water quality concerns.

 

Read the Ministry of Environment orders for the City of Hamilton to clean up discharges to Red Hill Creek.

July 2, 2002 Update
City gets more time to stop pollution of Red Hill Creek
At the same time the City of Hamilton delays solving its sewer problems, Environment Hamilton and the Lake Ontario Keeper team up as part of a new project to monitor river contamination around Lake Ontario.

Details
.

August 16, 2002

Environment Hamilton releases study of discharges to Red Hill Creek

|To Top|

© 2001 - 2006 Environment Hamilton Incorporated